Modern universities need reliable, efficient and transparent ways to evaluate subjective answer scripts-essays, long‑forms, diagrams, and manual responses. Addmen’s Digital Valuation System is a comprehensive solution designed to help examiners, departments and institutions manage valuation workflows online, providing real-time tracking, rubric-based marking, comments & secure saving, all in one unified platform.
Examiner Score Guide / Rubric Preview
Define scoring rubrics or guidelines that examiners use when grading each question. Ensures consistency across scripts and among different markers.
Answer Script Review Interface
Examiners can view student submissions, annotate or mark answers, provide remarks, and save their feedback. Support for uploaded scanned scripts or image‑based responses.
Question-wise Remarks Entry
Allows fine-grained feedback—comments per question or per part of a question rather than just overall remarks.
Page Visit Review / Script Navigation
Examiners can move through pages of students’ scripts, review each in sequence, revisit pages, and maintain context while grading.
Secure Saving & Finalization Controls
Examiner entries are saved securely; final save alerts help confirm before submission, reducing risk of accidental loss or misgrading.
Greater Efficiency
No need for physical handling of massive answer booklets; valuation can be done remotely or on‑site with scanned/photographed submissions.
Consistency & Fairness
Rubric-based scoring ensures markers use same criteria. Question-wise feedback helps students understand strengths & weaknesses.
Transparency & Accountability
View logs, page visit history, marks & remarks in clear interface; less chance of error or lost scripts.
Time Savings
Faster turnaround for results since all processes are digital; reduced logistics of distributing paper scripts.
Scale & Security
Designed for university-scale volumes; secure access, role-based permissions, audit trails, and secure data storage and transmission.
Script Submission & Upload
Students’ answer booklets or worksheets are scanned or captured via image/pdf and uploaded into the system.
Rubric Setup & Assignment
Admins or academic coordinators set up scoring rubrics per question. They assign examiners or marker roles.
Digital Marking & Feedback
Examiners log in, view submitted scripts, evaluate answers per rubric, add question‑wise remarks, and navigate through multi‑page submissions.
Review & Final Save
On completion, examiners perform final save. The system logs their activity, entries, and ensures secure storage.
Result Aggregation
Results and feedback are compiled, ready for release; dashboards can show progress of marking, average scores, timeline metrics.
Universities conducting courses with large subjective assessment components (essays, lab reports, project reports, etc.)
Faculties with remote examiners or decentralized marking
Institutions seeking to digitize their evaluation and reduce paper, shipping, storage & physical handling
Institutions demanding higher standards of consistency, fairness & feedback
| Feature | Advantage |
| Rubric‑based marking & fine‑grained comments | Uniform assessment & detailed feedback for students |
| Examiner interface with script navigation | Ease of use over multi‑page, complex scripts |
| Secure, audit‑friendly data handling | Reliability & integrity of evaluation process |
| Transparent activity logs (page visits, timestamps) | Traceability & oversight for institutions |
| Scale‑ready architecture | Handles high numbers of scripts & examiners without performance lag |
Related Links:
Addmen Group Copyright 2024. All Rights Reserved.
